Archive for July, 2008

Is ‘Project Management’ Really Worth It?

Do you ever wonder whether or not using the proper project management approach is worth the time and effort?  I mean wouldn’t it be easier to just dive in to what you have to do and get it over with? 

Not according to a landmark study commissioned by the Project Management Institute (the world’s leading non-profit association for project management individuals).  The results, delivered at the 2008 PMI Research Conference in Warsaw, Poland, strongly show that using project management techniques lead to a greater level of satisfaction with the project results, a higher degree of alignment between project goals and the business objectives of the company, more consistent methods that make it easier for senior management to keep track of what’s happening, realization of more tangible and intangible benefits due to a higher level of creativity and innovation, and a greater probability of a ‘successful’ project (on time, on budget). 

Factors that worked against projects being successful included changes in personnel who drive the project, lack of focus or will to do the project on the part of the project team, over bureaucratization of the project process, and poor alignment of goals between the project team and the managers the project is being done for. 

I guess none of this should be too surprising but in today’s world, where speed is everything and all projects need to be done yesterday, it is refreshing to know that there is some definitive proof that doing things right is more effective than just doing things.  It’s particularly telling that the study was not just based on multi-year, mega projects but included projects of varying size and complexity.  It’s true in tennis and it’s true in managing projects – form is important. 

For more details on the report, go to http://www.pmi.org/Value/default.htm for more info and a video of the full presentation.  The research monogram is available for pre-order from http://www.pmi.org/Marketplace/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?GMProduct=00101065301.  PMI members will receive a special four page synopsis with the August issues of PM Network and PMI today.    

What’s Up with PRMS

If you look on my web site ( www.shireyllc.com ), on the PRMS page, in the left hand column under ‘SCS Resources’, you will see a link to a white paper entitled ‘Where is PRMS Going?’. 

 

The gist of that article, written shortly after Infor acquired the product, indicated that Infor’s intent was to keep PRMS alive and available.  This was a 180 from SSA who had decided to chloroform PRMS and sweet talk everyone into moving to LX.  That (the Infor decision to spare PRMS) was followed about six months later with an Infor statement of direction that gave high level details on PRMS release 10.1 which was scheduled for a fourth quarter, 2007 debut.  And that is where we left our heroes. 

 

It is now third quarter 2008 and so far release 10.1 is nowhere to be seen.  And so the question becomes – what conclusions can we draw from that? 

 

Call me an optimist, but I still believe that Infor is planning to keep PRMS alive and available.  This is the basic Infor M.O.  They have done it with the other midrange products they have bought.  I think their feeling is – why rock the boat, if people are using it and they are on maintenance, why give them an excuse to think things over? 

 

But that doesn’t mean they are necessarily going to enhance PRMS.  They have enhanced Mapics, but I like to feel PRMS is a little farther along than Mapics was.  So to me it seems a fair question; do they have to enhance PRMS to keep it viable? 

 

Fortunately for me, that is a question that you have to answer.  My own opinion is that most PRMS shops are functioning quite nicely with 9.2 or 10.0, and that whatever problems they might have are business specific and might not be addressed by any enhancement Infor would do.  Those shops can just keep on keeping on, carefully adding whatever enhancements are required so that they don’t make a future upgrade (if there is one) too difficult.  Does that sound like you?  Do you fit into that category?  Just a quick show of hands (or comments on this post) . . . thank you. 

 

And if you are, that brings up a very interesting dilemma.  Maintenance.  Are you on it?  If so, what are you paying all that money for?  Help line services?  But can’t you find a cheaper option than that (hint, hint, nudge, nudge)?  Upgrades?  But if the next upgrade doesn’t come for 5 years and doesn’t really fix any of the problems you have, what’s that all about?   And if you drop maintenance – then what.  Is that a big risk – or a no brainer? 

 

The answer to that question depends on you and the resources you have available.  And what Infor finally decides to do about upgrading PRMS.  Unfortunately, that is hard to determine because I have asked several Infor staffers who are in the know on that – and they aren’t talking.  Plus we are looking for something more than a vague ‘we fully intend to continue supporting and/or enhancing PRMS as necessary for the client base’ statement.  Do it or don’t, but don’t just talk.     

 

Maybe the starting point is to sit down in a quiet place with a cup of herbal tea or a couple of shots of tequila, and really think – if I were in charge of PRMS, what changes would I make for my business.  Then you can start to make some decisions about how likely it would be that Infor would make those same changes in a future release.  And if you’d like someone to help you think through that – well, I’m listening.

Surviving Your Email

Remember when email was brand new?  It was amazing.  You could send someone a note and get a reply without all the small talk associated with calling them on the phone.   This so rocks! 

 

Sooooooo, fifteen years later, how’s that working out for you?  Still looking at email as  your savior? 

 

A lot of people, like IBM staffer Luis Suarez, aren’t.   As described in the June 29th issue of the New York Times, Suarez has started to diversify, shifting a lot of his email flood to phone calls, blogs, wiki’s, networking sites, and instant messaging.  But is that the wave of the future, is that what everyone should be doing?     

 

To start with, we need to consider a couple of points.

 

First, this is not an ‘email’ problem, it’s an ‘information handling’ problem.  As the number of people we connect with increases, the number of ‘information units’ (IUs) coming our way also increases.  And every one of these IUs wants a piece of us.  Email is one way that those IU’s come in to us but it is not the only way, especially if you start diversifying ala Luis. 

 

Second, we need to accept that all emails are an interruption, just like someone sticking their head in our office or calling us on the phone when we are sitting down to eat.   That doesn’t make them evil; interruptions are how the world let’s us know something is going on and sometimes that information is critical to what we are doing.  But interruptions do derail whatever you are working on at the moment.  I know everyone thinks you can handle email by multi-tasking, answering and writing emails while you are doing something else, but the simple truth is – you can’t.  The human brain doesn’t actually multi-task (unless you include breathing as one of the tasks).  What it does do is ‘short time frame swapping’, which lets you do two or more tasks less efficiently than if you did each one separately.  No matter how you spin it, email is an interruption and the only question you have is whether the information stream that it introduces is  more important than the one you are currently dealing with. 

 

Finally, bringing things under control may require some changes in you.  I am going to ignore those of you who parade your email numbers around like a badge of honor.  You need professional help by certified counselors and I urge you to get it.  But even normal people can develop a mind set where they need to be constantly communicating with someone.  You can see it in their eyes; they finish one call or clear their email and look up with a desperate, lost expression as they frantically try to figure out who they could contact next.   If that’s you, get a grip.  Email because there is a reason, not just because you can. 

 

Now maybe none of this is important.  I mean maybe it’s just the way things are, like the way your brother-in-law eats soup or having poker get so much air time on ESPN.  But I think it does matter because productivity is very important today.  In some situations it makes the difference between the keeping your job and being released to ‘pursue other interests’.  And there is no doubt that email can seriously eat into your productivity.  More importantly, however, the constant interruptive nature of email can be slowly, quietly, inexorably exhausting, draining your energy and turning the days into obstacles that you need to drag yourself over. 

 

So what do we do?  Shut off our email and head for Katmandu?  Get ourselves hypnotized so that it doesn’t bother us to have 500 unread emails in our inbox?  Or is there another option? 

 

Luis Suarez recommends shifting some of the IU’s to other communication mediums, but is that a complete strategy for reining in your email?  What else can you do to limit the interruptive effect that it introduces?   Quite a bit, actually, and if you drop me an email (dave@shireyllc.com) I will send you a special detailed ‘Email Action Plan’ that provides some very concrete steps to help you get a handle on your email.  (And yes, I realize there is a certain irony in me expecting you to send an email.)  There is no obligation. Representatives will not contact you.  I will just send you the action plan.  I already have your email address so what else can I do to you?   So shout out and see what kind of crazy ideas I have about reducing your email interruptions and make yourself more productive.Â