Archive for December, 2010

Inside Out Pants

Like many of you, it has been hard to avoid the Back to the Future Marathon on AMC. And, I have to admit I have watched Part II about 3 times by now.  I like those movies.  Reminds me of simpler days.  But the one thing I can’t figure is why the one prediction made in Part II that makes sense hasn’t come true – kids wearing their pants inside out.

I mean, it make sense.  Pants can’t get any lower without not being there and maybe inside out pants is the next big thing.  I haven’t lost hope yet, because BTTF Part II is set in 2015.  So, we have four more years to see if it comes true.  If you have kids in the 9 – 10 range, start pushing it now.  I love to be right.

Tags:

My Predictions for 2011

 Yeah, yeah.  I know that every industry expert around has their list of predictions for the next year but I’m no industry expert.  Not sure if that comes out to a compliment or not.  Anyway, here is what I think will happen to those of us in the trenches. 

First, no matter what the trends or what the experts say, things will go on for most of us just like last year.  You will be underappreciated, over worked, and underpaid.  You have to like the consistency.   

Second, people will continue to talk about cloud computing like it is the second coming of Grace Hopper.  Maybe it is, and maybe it isn’t, but with all the hype, we will never know.   

Third, I will have my third article published in System iNews in March 2011.  This isn’t really a prediction as I have to hand it in by next Tuesday.  It will be about Program Complexity. 

Fourth, most of the people who are on 5.4 or below will remain on 5.4 or below.   

Fifth, the CEO or CFO of the companies that are on 5.4 or below will begin to think ‘I bet we could run this whole thing on Windows’.   

Sixth, the i Manifest movement will continue to grow and gather supporters in an effort to encourage IBM to more effectively market the i as the machine of the future.

Seventh, IBM will continue to market the i in an ineffective and pathetic manner, because fully supporting the i runs contrary to their basic business plan of selling services and big iron. 

Eighth, more companies will decide they need to move to SAP or Oracle and off of more sensible ERP systems, thus bringing us closer to the predicted collapse of civilization as we know it (May 28, 2019). 

Ninth, people will continue to say that us i types are behind the times and technically obsolete.

And Tenth, when most of us ask for the time and resources to upgrade our knowledge base we will be told there is no money in the budget for it and no time to do it anyway given the current project load.

Good luck in 2011.

Tags: , , , ,

Cloud Computing – Part 2

Last post I admitted that I might have been wrong.  I admitted that there might be something to cloud computing.  But at the same time I see a couple of  ‘clouds’ on the horizon. 

 

First, is what might be an emotional point; the outsourcing of technical knowledge, the ‘brain drain’, the erosion of technical knowledge at the company level.  

 

Cloud computing is about contracting out your technical environment.  It is about letting someone else worry about all that stuff and just concentrating on what is important to you.  And I don’t know if I like that.

 

The theory is that there will be cost savings if you don’t need a guru or two at every company, just a handful of them at the cloud provider.   I’m just not sure that contacting out the knowledge positions is a good idea, especially if there aren’t any savings (see next point). 

 

I know this position might label me as old fashioned, not willing to trust my vendor who I have chosen.  But I guess when push comes to shove, I don’t trust anyone, especially a vendor that I have chosen, particularly with what will arguably be the life blood of my company.     

 

Second, and speaking of cost, I don’t know if I believe that it will be cheaper.

 

Oh, I know, cloud computing is supposed to be a source of cost savings, possibly huge cost savings.  Trouble is, I am not sure that in the long run the cloud will really be any cheaper than what we have now.  The reason for that is easy – Shirey’s Law – Costs never decrease, they just change category and get harder to compare.  If there is one thing that America is built on it is that there is nothing you can invent that I can’t find a way to make money off of, even if it seems free when you start. 

 

It just seems to me that if you follow the reasoning of cloud computing, then purchased ERP systems should be practically free.  Anyone run into that lately? 

 

I agree that theory suggests lower costs and I can’t prove what I am saying, but past experience makes it very hard for me to believe that we are about to free up a boat load of cash. 

 

And the final concern I have is – what if through some tragic error you pick the wrong partner. 

 

Suppose you find that the support you get is not exactly what you expected, or that service levels in certain geographic areas are not acceptable.  How hard will it be to switch over to another vendor?  I just have a feeling that doing that will not be a totally transparent activity. 

 

And if you have gotten rid of your technical staff, it might be almost impossible to get off the cloud and return to your original configuration. 

 

So it could be possible that once you go onto the cloud it might be very difficult to change direction and either return to earth or else find another provider. 

 

Now obviously, the above are worst case scenarios.  And I am not even close to saying ‘don’t cloud’.  But it’s not all savings and caviar either.  In some ways, it’s a siren song.  Just switch to the cloud and no more 2 AM calls from some user in Fuji. 

 

But the truth is more complicated that that.  There are many factors to consider and what is right for one organization may be poison for another.  So take a good look at the cloud – but do it with your eyes open and a good skeptical frame of mind. 

Tags: , ,